lexology facebook

Experimental Treatments: Myall v Ministry of Defence and Serco

The attraction occurred earlier than Mrs Justice May DBE. Despite intensive submissions by the claimant, Mrs Justice May refused to contemplate the applying for a cut up trial, repeating Master Gidden’s view that the claimant had failed to supply any supportive medical proof in relation to the therapy which he sought.

This seems to provide voice to the choice of Jones v Royal Devon NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 2706 through which it was held that claimant’s medical bills have to be thought-about by the court docket and the court docket should “apply the touchstone of reasonableness and principles of remoteness and proportionality” when contemplating such heads of loss.

What this implies for you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *